Outsmarting the storm: How other cities tame the flood

Originally published in Manila Bulletin

Every monsoon season Metro Manila rehearses the same grim tableau: traffic crawls through brown water, families stack furniture on second storey landings and city engineers scramble to restart stalled pumps. Even with a quarter trillion peso flood control budget, the country still shoulders about US $625 million in average annual losses—a figure the World Bank warns will climb as storms intensify and land subsides.

That stubborn reality should prod decision makers to look beyond higher levees and deeper culverts and study how other cities have reframed flooding from an engineering failure to a design challenge. Singapore, Berlin and the Netherlands are three contrasting examples. Their contexts differ—tropical island, temperate capital, low lying delta—but each has embraced the insight that water must be given space to move, soak and linger rather than be hustled out to sea at the first drop.

Singapore began rethinking its concrete drains in 2006, when the national water agency launched the Active, Beautiful, Clean (ABC) Waters Program. At Bishan–Ang Mo Kio Park, a straight flood canal was replaced by a meandering, bio engineered river that can safely inundate park lawns during cloudbursts and slip back within natural banks when the rain stops. The makeover increased conveyance capacity, cut downstream flood peaks and proved popular enough to spur similar retrofits island wide.

Berlin offers a European twist on the same idea. After a series of summer cloudbursts overwhelmed its century old sewers, the city adopted the Schwammstadt—“sponge city”—paradigm in 2018. One headline project now rising near Unter den Linden is a cistern 40 metres across and 30 metres deep that will hold almost 17,000 cubic metres of storm water before releasing it to treatment plants. Dozens of neighbourhood pilots pair green roofs, permeable pavements and fee rebates for buildings that retain runoff, steadily turning policy into street level hydrology.

Where land is scarce yet rivers sprawl, the Netherlands supplies another lesson. Its “Room for the River” program in the Regge and Rhine basins has set back dikes, lowered floodplains and restored side channels so that high water can expand without threatening homes. The result has been measurable risk reduction and, unexpectedly, a boom in recreation and biodiversity that softens public resistance to further interventions.

China’s nationwide sponge city directive, meanwhile, shows that scaling up is possible.  Independent reviews of pilot districts in Wuhan found flood incidents cut by roughly 60 percent once green roofs, porous streets and subterranean tanks covered most new development. None of these places claims to have eliminated flooding; rather, they have diversified their toolkits so that rainfall is managed at many points—soaked into soil, detained in parks, reused inside buildings—before it ever reaches a drain.

For the Philippines, emulation is not copy and paste. Our storms are more intense than Berlin’s, our land subsides faster than Singapore’s and our rivers carry volcanic silt that the Dutch do not face. Yet the strategic principle transcends geography: integrate hydrology into urban form instead of tacking it on afterward. Adopting that mindset would expand the menu of solutions to include permeable parking lots in Quezon City, detention plazas in Cagayan de Oro, mangrove buffers in Tacloban and, crucially, zoning codes that reward developers for treating rain as a resource.

Looking outward is not an admission of defeat but an act of prudence. Each foreign case offers a tested prototype, complete with design manuals, financing hacks and public engagement tactics that can be adapted faster and cheaper than inventing from scratch. In a climate future where yesterday’s “century flood” can arrive every few years, the most dangerous strategy is to cling to a single, concrete only playbook. The wiser course is to borrow broadly, experiment locally and—like the cities we aspire to—learn to absorb whatever tomorrow’s skies deliver.

This opinion column is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). You are free to share, adapt, and redistribute this content, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and original source.