Democratizing AI: A call for digital liberation

Originally published in Manila Bulletin

I have long warned that AI’s rapid advancement could parallel historical patterns of colonization. If AI truly represents a black swan event—a disruptive moment in history—then we must confront what happens when 99 percent of the world’s languages are left behind. This is far more than a linguistic concern; it strikes at the heart of accessibility, representation, and digital equity. If we do not change who leads AI development, we risk inaugurating a new era of digital colonization, where only a privileged few command the tools to shape tomorrow.

Language is the gateway to identity and knowledge. Every tongue carries unique stories, scientific insights, and cultural practices. When AI models are built almost exclusively on English, Mandarin, or Spanish, speakers of Quechua, Karay-a, Wolof, or Māori—and thousands of others—are effectively barred from AI-powered education, healthcare guidance, and local governance tools. This digital exclusion mirrors the colonial imposition of a ruler’s language, which erased indigenous voices across continents. To democratize AI, we must embed multilingual capabilities at its core, ensuring that every community can interact with, contribute to, and benefit from intelligent systems.

But democratization cannot stop at translation. Accessibility demands that AI systems recognize diverse faces, speech patterns, and lived experiences. Today, facial-recognition algorithms struggle to identify darker skin tones accurately, and voice assistants stumble over non-standard accents. Such failures aren’t mere technical glitches—they reinforce social hierarchies by privileging users who already exist within narrow design parameters. To break this cycle, development teams must reflect the world’s rich diversity, drawing talent from underrepresented regions and cultures. Only then can we train AI on datasets that capture the full spectrum of human experience.

Who controls the narrative of AI matters as much as the technology itself. If a handful of Western tech giants dictate the research agenda, we will see more surveillance applications, targeted advertising, and productivity tools shaped by corporate profit motives rather than public interest. Democratizing AI means inviting policymakers, ethicists, community leaders, and engineers from the Global South, indigenous nations, and marginalized communities into decision-making arenas. These stakeholders are best positioned to identify local challenges—be it small-holder farming, maternal health in remote villages, or preservation of endangered plant wisdom—and to guide AI toward serving those needs.

A truly democratized AI ecosystem is inherently multipolar. Instead of funneling all research toward a small number of massive, monolithic models, we should champion open-source frameworks, federated learning networks, and regional innovation hubs. Envision universities in Accra, São Paulo, and Kathmandu each hosting AI platforms tailored to their linguistic and cultural contexts. Governments can mandate that public-sector AI tools be open by default. Philanthropic organizations can sponsor community-driven data-collection initiatives. Startups can thrive under policies that reward privacy-preserving, inclusive design. This decentralized approach not only accelerates innovation but also guards against the concentration of power and potential misuse.

Yet software alone will not suffice. True digital equity requires robust infrastructure. Affordable broadband, local data centers, and edge computing capabilities must reach rural hamlets and underserved urban neighborhoods alike. Public–private partnerships should focus on last-mile connectivity and subsidized devices for schools, clinics, and cooperatives. Without these investments, even the most inclusive algorithms remain out of reach for those who need them most.

Finally, democratization must be anchored by ethical guardrails and community governance. Transparent audit trails, citizen assemblies, and enforceable data-privacy rights are essential to prevent the rise of a corporate or state-controlled digital empire. We must design participatory frameworks that give local communities real say over data collection, model training, and application deployment. This is how we ensure AI serves the collective good rather than narrow interests.

Decolonization once reshaped political and cultural sovereignty. Today, we stand at the threshold of digital decolonization. By weaving diverse languages, perspectives, and priorities into AI’s very fabric, we can transform it from a tool of exclusion into an engine of global empowerment. The stakes could not be higher: if 99 percent of the world’s languages and the human wisdom they carry are silenced, AI will have merely replicated colonialism in binary code. But if we democratize AI now, we can write the next chapter as a story of collaboration, resilience, and shared prosperity—one in which every community has the tools to thrive on its own terms.

This opinion column is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). You are free to share, adapt, and redistribute this content, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and original source.